I do so tonight to signal the fact that our vote tomorrow should be a vote that does not accentuate party lines, that when people go and register for a marriage license, they do not declare a political party preference, they are not required to register as Democrats or Republicans or independents or libertarians or vegetarians, they go and apply for a marriage license. Tomorrow, Mr. Speaker, it is my fervent hope that we will see a bipartisan vote to restore rationality and common sense to the peculiar situation we find because of a quirk in the rules where we have failed to make this marriage tax relief permanent.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “I do so tonight to signal the fact that our vote tomorrow should be a vote that does not accentuate party lines, that…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for bipartisan support for marriage tax relief.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
as my colleague points out, under current law what does this mean? Let me offer an example. If there is a child abuser in California who has been proven through the courts to have a history of child abuse, that history is on record in the…
when your house is on fire, do you hold a hearing? When you need emergency treatment, do you take time for a hearing? I rise in support of this resolution because at times we need not be prisoners of process but instead champions of…
History shows that an independent central bank that is making monetary decisions free of political influence can certainly enhance economic growth.
my colleagues, I welcome the newest Member of the House from California; and I, likewise, welcome this commonsense amendment because in this amendment the gentleman from California encapsulates the challenge facing this House. We claim we…





