Why muzzle the veterans 60 days before the election? If they have concerns in a free society, let them bring them forth and make them clear. Do not abridge that. Oh, yes, I guess that is right, that they can advertise on the pages of the New York Times. I know that is of acute interest to at least a few in this Chamber. But why would we abridge their rights to freedom of speech? This is the essence of the battle of ideas in a free society, and what has gone on here is suppression of that debate, the very thing we should champion.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “Why muzzle the veterans 60 days before the election? If they have concerns in a free society, let them bring them forth…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about veterans' rights to free speech before elections.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
this morning's Arizona Republic carries encouraging news amidst the horrific challenges encountered by the colleague who preceded me on the floor and so many fellow Americans. It is the story of Doyle Smith and family. Doyle has six…
I would answer his question with an interrogative of my own. Is the gentleman aware of the extensive hearings held this summer by many different Members of the House outside Washington, D.C.----
my colleagues, I welcome the newest Member of the House from California; and I, likewise, welcome this commonsense amendment because in this amendment the gentleman from California encapsulates the challenge facing this House. We claim we…
The security of our financial system is so important, especially in this digital age where consumers have unprecedented access to financial information.





