I am pleased to be offering a bipartisan amendment with my friend and colleague, the gentleman from Mississippi, Mr. Gene Taylor, that will benefit some of the poorest children in America. The amendment will increase funding for the section 8007 program of the Impact Aid Program which funds school construction, and it will increase that aid from $7 million to $25 million. To offset this increase, the gentleman from Mississippi [Mr. Taylor] and I propose to reduce funding for the National Labor Relations Board, or NLRB, by $18 million. Mr. Chairman, as many Members know, Impact Aid funds children's education on military bases and on Indian lands. Because these areas lack an adequate tax base or bonding capacity, they often cannot meet the educational needs of their children, and that is just wrong. The Federal Government has an obligation to educate children who reside on Federal land. Indeed, helping to meet those needs is the purpose of the Impact Aid Program.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “I am pleased to be offering a bipartisan amendment with my friend and colleague, the gentleman from Mississippi, Mr.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a bipartisan amendment to increase funding for the Impact Aid Program.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
my colleagues, I rise in strong support of the rule and the legislation. Let me start with this observation. With all due respect to my colleague from Massachusetts, it is never a sham when we come to the people's House with legitimately…
my colleagues, here we are in America's House, having a debate that is altogether appropriate, because as our founders stated the goal, it was to form a more perfect union. And because we are human beings, there is always a gulf between…
I come to the well again, and it seems like only yesterday we were here. In fact, it was yesterday, was it not? And, Madam Speaker, I think we have just seen why my colleague, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. English), is one of the…
I would implore you that one key aspect of that financial education should be regarding the unintended consequences of Federal intervention in the markets...





