we will have a decision in the days to come. Do we opt for a genuine Patients' Bill of Rights, or do we instead follow the siren song of the trial lawyer's right to bill. Make no mistake, when Americans are sick, they do not want to deal with Washington bureaucrats or with insurance company bureaucrats. They want help from medical professionals. Mr. Speaker, the choice is simple. Are we going to allow patients seeking relief to end up in court or to be treated in a clinic? By the way, do we want to destroy health insurance as we know it? That may be the very serious unintended consequence of people who mean well but seem to put their faith in healing more in trial lawyers than they do in physicians. Mr. Speaker, it is incumbent upon this House to pass a bill that is a help to patients, rather than a boom to the trial lawyer's lobby. Let us opt for the plan of the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Fletcher) to truly help patients rather than trial lawyers.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “we will have a decision in the days to come. Do we opt for a genuine Patients' Bill of Rights, or do we instead follow…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the Patients' Bill of Rights and its implications for healthcare and trial lawyers.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
It is essential that we defend what this country is about and what it represents so that we can indeed, counter enemies like Russia.
when your house is on fire, do you hold a hearing? When you need emergency treatment, do you take time for a hearing? I rise in support of this resolution because at times we need not be prisoners of process but instead champions of…
the opportunity costs of companies not listing other things of Sarbanes-Oxley as being as high as $1.4 trillion.
I would implore you that one key aspect of that financial education should be regarding the unintended consequences of Federal intervention in the markets...





