Let me see if this analogy works, because from time to time, the attorneys might say, there is a preponderance of physical evidence that I battle with my physique, the scale. This almost sounds like in lieu of weighing myself on a calibrated scale, that I take my two youngest children, aged 8 and 5, because, after all, they possess DNA, which is a part of me, and they have my hereditary characteristics and to achieve a desired weight, I would put them on the scales and then extrapolate based on statistical samples such as the ideal height and weight charts, the actuarial tables we see from different life insurance companies, and rather than take an actual number from the scale, through statistical legerdemain, we would project a desired outcome. Is that an apt analogy?
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “Let me see if this analogy works, because from time to time, the attorneys might say, there is a preponderance of…”
Editor's note · Context
Using an analogy to discuss the importance of accurate measurements in a debate.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
I have introduced legislation, in fact it passed unanimously through our subcommittee and committee, to repeal most of the swaps push-out, Section 716 of Dodd-Frank.
I commend one of the procedures, or one of the provisions, that is included in this legislative vehicle of extenders for tax considerations, and that is, the extension of the solar and fuel cell investment tax credits. Why do we offer…
The figures we are dealing with are stunning because, to date, the GSEs have consumed approximately $150 billion from our taxpayers.
I come to the well again, and it seems like only yesterday we were here. In fact, it was yesterday, was it not? And, Madam Speaker, I think we have just seen why my colleague, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. English), is one of the…





