I thank the gentleman for 5 minutes, when really 10 seconds is needed. Just for the sake of pointing this out, when we talk about the extra-Constitutionality or the implication is that somehow these endeavors are unconstitutional, I would simply point out nowhere in this document do you see the phrase ``continuing resolution.'' Nowhere in this document is it explicitly delineated that above all costs, government will remain open through the process of continuing resolutions. Good people can disagree about the intent of the Constitution and the dynamism of it and how it can be stretched and pulled and turned or interpreted in different manners. But I think it is worth noting that this is not some sort of sanctified notion that is somehow noble that we go back simply to business as usual and not deal with this question at this juncture in our history, for now the time draws here.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “I thank the gentleman for 5 minutes, when really 10 seconds is needed. Just for the sake of pointing this out, when we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of continuing resolutions and constitutional interpretation.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
I appreciate the difference of opinion in the people's House. I listened with great interest to my friend from Texas. Indeed, when this question was before the House on prior occasions, at least a couple of times in my time in this…
Clearly we need that kind of quantitative analysis, because obviously we have to assess the costs and benefits of what we are doing.
where do I begin? Acknowledging that one of the central tenets and challenges of the legislative process is incremental reform, we can all understand that. But also understanding that in terms of truth in labeling, are we in fact engaged…
I rise this morning in remembrance of a great American and great Arizonan, Bob Goldwater. If the last name sounds familiar, it should. The brother of Arizona's favorite son, Bob Goldwater labored alongside his brother in the family…





