Reclaiming my time, when you talk about that $500 per child tax credit, I cannot help but think of the people of the Sixth District of Arizona who send me here to represent them. I cannot help but think of a single mother who may have three children, whose spouse may have deserted her, who is working hard, playing by the rules, trying to provide for her family and yes, seeking outside educational skills to heighten her earning potential, despite the trauma that has most assuredly occurred in her personal life. By denying the $500 per child tax credit, the champions of big government, the champions of expansive and excessive bureaucracy are saying to that single mother, ``No, indeed, ma'am. You do not need that $1,500 to spend or save for your family as you see fit. That money instead should be taken from you and given to the bureaucracy in Washington, D.C.'' How fundamentally cynical, how philosophically bankrupt, how essentially immoral that notion is. For what we do here is to establish the primacy of the State, the primacy of the bureaucracy instead of the power of the people. In a free society, that young lady struggling to provide for those three children should have that money to spend on those children as she sees fit.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “Reclaiming my time, when you talk about that $500 per child tax credit, I cannot help but think of the people of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the $500 per child tax credit during a floor speech.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
Clearly we need that kind of quantitative analysis, because obviously we have to assess the costs and benefits of what we are doing.
We know how important small bank lending is to small communities or to any community, to businesses and to helping businesses grow and create jobs.
I am not a custodian of the hearing record in the United States House of Representatives, any more than the gentleman is, no matter the----
I think my colleague from California, the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, for this time and as always, I listened with interest to my good friend from New York, and I think it illustrates some very real differences. Tax relief…





