I thought especially eloquent was the gentleman who preceded me at this podium, the gentleman from Kansas. And while he is quite eloquent in his verbiage, I thought the stack of books that now comprise the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Speaker, with those joining us on television this evening and this afternoon back in my home State of Arizona could see with their own eyes that huge stack of books in a system that has grown more and more complicated. I think just as there were volumes upon volumes, that picture spoke volumes. A couple of arguments used and one, quite candidly, that some Members of the new majority bought into, was this notion that somehow the Constitution of the United States should not be amended or amended only sparingly. I just thought it was worth going back to article 5 of the Constitution, this document of limited and enumerated powers, to see precisely what is said.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “I thought especially eloquent was the gentleman who preceded me at this podium, the gentleman from Kansas. And while he…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the complexity of the Internal Revenue Code and constitutional amendment during a debate on taxation.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
just a few short weeks ago, the Prime Minister of Israel addressed a joint session of Congress. He said, in part, and I quote, ``There has not been 1 year, 1 week, or even 1 day of peace in our tortured land.'' He went on to say, Madam…
The United States has become an increasingly hostile environment for investment relative to other developed nations.
We want our small businesses to be able to acquire capital, we want investors to be able to engage in that marketplace ever more fully.
I think my colleague from California, the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, for this time and as always, I listened with interest to my good friend from New York, and I think it illustrates some very real differences. Tax relief…





