I would remind the House, Mr. Speaker, that in passing the rule for the authorization bill there was a self-executing amendment sponsored by myself, by the chairman of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Stump), and my colleague the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Redmond) celebrating his one year anniversary of service in this House today. Perhaps this will afford other Members who perhaps failed to vote for the rule an opportunity to join with us to stand firm to protect veterans' programs, as we stated in the rule. So, in that spirit of bipartisanship, if this would afford Members who avoided voting for the rule on authorization, if they want a second bite at the apple, well, that is fine, because it also restates the intent of a majority of us who have gone on record in this House with a vote to say absolutely, keep veterans' programs intact; do not even contemplate spending any of that money.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “I would remind the House, Mr. Speaker, that in passing the rule for the authorization bill there was a self-executing…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of protecting veterans' programs during a House floor debate.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
when your house is on fire, do you hold a hearing? When you need emergency treatment, do you take time for a hearing? I rise in support of this resolution because at times we need not be prisoners of process but instead champions of…
We know how important small bank lending is to small communities or to any community, to businesses and to helping businesses grow and create jobs.
I am not a custodian of the hearing record in the United States House of Representatives, any more than the gentleman is, no matter the----
The figures we are dealing with are stunning because, to date, the GSEs have consumed approximately $150 billion from our taxpayers.





