Reclaiming my time, and again I thank the gentleman from Georgia for bringing forth this very cogent observation. And again, Mr. Speaker, we should note this is not said with venom nor vitriol, not in the form of a playground taunt, but, really, Mr. Speaker, just to examine the record of the gentleman who resides at the big White House at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, for if words are to mean something, actions should correspond to the words. And, indeed, as my friend from Georgia points out, we have a President who campaigned in 1992 on balancing the Federal budget in 5 years. Yet when confronted with a realistic plan that actually gave him a 2-year grace period, if you will, a balanced budget plan which was introduced by the new majority, back I believe last October, the President chose to veto that; instead putting in its place a document of suspicious foundation from this standpoint, Mr. Speaker. It would be akin, and I will use a personal example, I am fighting the battle of the bulge around my waistline, it would be akin to saying to someone we are going to give you a year to lose 50 pounds. We ask you to lose two pounds in the first 50 weeks of the year, and in the final 2 weeks of the year we ask you to lose the remaining 48 pounds. On paper the mathematical operation can work, in real life that would be very difficult. That is what we are dealing with.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “Reclaiming my time, and again I thank the gentleman from Georgia for bringing forth this very cogent observation. And…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing the President's budget plan and veto during a discussion on fiscal responsibility.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
I think my colleague from California, the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, for this time and as always, I listened with interest to my good friend from New York, and I think it illustrates some very real differences. Tax relief…
again I thank my colleague from Arizona; and, likewise, I have no additional requests for time, and I yield back the balance of my time and urge passage of H.R. 327. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the…
I have introduced legislation, in fact it passed unanimously through our subcommittee and committee, to repeal most of the swaps push-out, Section 716 of Dodd-Frank.
as my colleague points out, under current law what does this mean? Let me offer an example. If there is a child abuser in California who has been proven through the courts to have a history of child abuse, that history is on record in the…





