Mr. Chairman, I have been examining this issue for many months now and have come to the conclusion that the White House Counsel's Office continues to use taxpayer funds to pay legal staff to work on the President's personal legal issues. I think this is clearly a misuse of taxpayer funds. That is why I introduced a sense of the House resolution this March that, along with the cosponsorship of 30 of my colleagues, sends a clear signal to the White House that the public will not stand for footing personal legal bills of its elected officials. Mr. Chairman, the White House Counsel's Office does not need 34 staff members, when previous Counsel's Office staff was limited to seven at most, and the American taxpayers should not be held accountable for $2.36 million in salaries for this legal work.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “Mr. Chairman, I have been examining this issue for many months now and have come to the conclusion that the White House…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the misuse of taxpayer funds by the White House Counsel's Office.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
I think my colleague from California, the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, for this time and as always, I listened with interest to my good friend from New York, and I think it illustrates some very real differences. Tax relief…
History shows that an independent central bank that is making monetary decisions free of political influence can certainly enhance economic growth.
again we return to the people's House to discuss the people's business and the central question that cuts to the very core of our existence: free men and women engaged in an armed struggle to advance freedom elsewhere in the world; our…
The United States has more, possesses more power than the world has ever seen.





