I also appreciate the gentleman's revision of American history because the gentleman, I know, swore to uphold and defend the Constitution. Let us just simply read the first clause from article 5, Mr. Speaker. The Congress, whenever two-thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution. There is no subservience to some Washingtonized rules of the House. This House, whenever it shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to the Constitution, but to the revisionist history offered by my colleague from Colorado on the left, I would point out that when it came to questions of revenue in the Federal Government and the intent of our founders, there is a larger question this House should consider.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “I also appreciate the gentleman's revision of American history because the gentleman, I know, swore to uphold and defend…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the importance of constitutional amendments and criticizing a colleague's interpretation of history.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
I would answer his question with an interrogative of my own. Is the gentleman aware of the extensive hearings held this summer by many different Members of the House outside Washington, D.C.----
I think my colleague from California, the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, for this time and as always, I listened with interest to my good friend from New York, and I think it illustrates some very real differences. Tax relief…
Recognizing that Dodd-Frank is a massive law that was passed with the best of intentions...
again I thank my colleague from Arizona; and, likewise, I have no additional requests for time, and I yield back the balance of my time and urge passage of H.R. 327. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the…





