That is the audio that is missing, according to the testimony of a professor from Johns Hopkins University. What is also fascinating, and my colleagues have distinguished themselves, I believe, in these special orders where they have helped to inform the American people, but I want to call on my colleague, the gentleman from Arizona [Mr. Shadegg], for some free legal advice here in the people's House, and it has to do with some other things we have heard now dealing with these issues, because there are some at the White House, some attorneys there, who tell us that if a law is an old law, it should not count any longer. I refer specifically to the Pindleton Act. Let me ask my colleague, the gentleman from Arizona [Mr. Shadegg], has he ever seen a situation where a cogent, logical defense is, a law is old, therefore, it should not be observed?
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “That is the audio that is missing, according to the testimony of a professor from Johns Hopkins University. What is also…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the validity of old laws during a speech on the House floor.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
my colleagues, I welcome the newest Member of the House from California; and I, likewise, welcome this commonsense amendment because in this amendment the gentleman from California encapsulates the challenge facing this House. We claim we…
again we return to the people's House to discuss the people's business and the central question that cuts to the very core of our existence: free men and women engaged in an armed struggle to advance freedom elsewhere in the world; our…
the opportunity costs of companies not listing other things of Sarbanes-Oxley as being as high as $1.4 trillion.
I thank my friend from Iowa; and before I get to the topic at hand, I, too, would like to offer a few observations about the preceding presentation in the people's House. Those who have heard me speak from time to time know that quite…





