They derided it as extreme. Now look at what has happened. We see that it makes extremely good sense to have Washington spend less so that families can spend more, to make sure that the money that belongs to the people in the first place stays in their paychecks; and in so doing, actually letting Americans have more of their own money to save, spend, and invest, create new jobs and new opportunities. Now, we are in a situation where the tables have turned. Oh, there is still work to do, as my colleague has pointed out; our commitment to our seniors in terms of the Social Security Preservation Act, which we cosponsored, the challenges we still confront in terms of ending the scourge on drugs. In a free society, it is an ongoing battle. But we have made the first steps toward realizing those dreams for our children.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “They derided it as extreme. Now look at what has happened. We see that it makes extremely good sense to have Washington…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing fiscal policy and its impact on families and future generations.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
the opportunity costs of companies not listing other things of Sarbanes-Oxley as being as high as $1.4 trillion.
again I thank my colleague from Arizona; and, likewise, I have no additional requests for time, and I yield back the balance of my time and urge passage of H.R. 327. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the…
Clearly we need that kind of quantitative analysis, because obviously we have to assess the costs and benefits of what we are doing.
I have introduced legislation, in fact it passed unanimously through our subcommittee and committee, to repeal most of the swaps push-out, Section 716 of Dodd-Frank.





