Mr. Speaker, I thank you for this debate; and it does point up some basic differences that exist between the gentleman from California (Mr. Stark) and many of us on the majority side. It is interesting to hear the call for nationalized insurance, and certainly that is one philosophical point of view that one can offer here. I think it is important not to lose sight of our goal. Indeed, this House has acted in incremental fashion before to put in place long-term care insurance. Indeed, already close to 5.5 million Americans have these policies. We expect them to grow in short time to 11.5 million Americans. That is a significant portion of our population. And we need to offer an opportunity for this to grow even larger because the question comes, who will be responsible as our society continues to age? Will we see up to 75 percent of funds coming into the government dealing with questions of health and old age for the American populace? Or commensurate with our national heritage and our primary philosophy in this country, does it not make sense to provide for self-sufficiency? The challenge has been noted. Budgetary restraints have kept us from the ideal, but we deal with the real here today.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “Mr. Speaker, I thank you for this debate; and it does point up some basic differences that exist between the gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing long-term care insurance and the philosophical differences in health care policy.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
We know how important small bank lending is to small communities or to any community, to businesses and to helping businesses grow and create jobs.
my colleagues, I welcome the newest Member of the House from California; and I, likewise, welcome this commonsense amendment because in this amendment the gentleman from California encapsulates the challenge facing this House. We claim we…
I am not a custodian of the hearing record in the United States House of Representatives, any more than the gentleman is, no matter the----
again we return to the people's House to discuss the people's business and the central question that cuts to the very core of our existence: free men and women engaged in an armed struggle to advance freedom elsewhere in the world; our…





