Perhaps as the Speaker listens to the debate and as our colleagues in the Chamber listen to the debate, they might be mystified that what we have done is transform a debate on expanding opportunities for welfare to work and to lift the burden of the marriage tax penalty on those who need that help and thereby help bolster the institution of marriage to be caught up in the debate on other bills and other issues that we indeed will address in the days ahead. The legislation before us today helps us simplify the Tax Code. It increases the standard deduction for married couples, 300,000 married couples, would allow them to claim the standard deduction on their tax return rather than itemize. That, in itself, is a major simplification. It seems to me, Mr. Speaker, that we should work to emphasize policies that are family friendly, policies that would support marriage when we offer this economic incentive. It allows us to accelerate the lifting of the burdensome marriage tax penalty. It accelerates relief for 21 million married couples, and that is vitally important to offer them access to the American dream.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “Perhaps as the Speaker listens to the debate and as our colleagues in the Chamber listen to the debate, they might be…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax legislation aimed at supporting marriage and simplifying the Tax Code.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
the state of Arizona has a rich history, much of it left to us by Native Americans from centuries past. One way in which the great tribal traditions and cultural stories of our native predecessors are passed down is in the form of…
I rise this morning in remembrance of a great American and great Arizonan, Bob Goldwater. If the last name sounds familiar, it should. The brother of Arizona's favorite son, Bob Goldwater labored alongside his brother in the family…
when your house is on fire, do you hold a hearing? When you need emergency treatment, do you take time for a hearing? I rise in support of this resolution because at times we need not be prisoners of process but instead champions of…
as my colleague points out, under current law what does this mean? Let me offer an example. If there is a child abuser in California who has been proven through the courts to have a history of child abuse, that history is on record in the…





