I would welcome the gentlewoman joining with the chairman of the Subcommittee on Social Security in sponsoring H.R. 3351 if, in fact, she is afraid that somehow Social Security will be taken from today's seniors. Let me humbly suggest, Mr. Speaker, that nothing could be further from the truth, and those who offer that argument, no matter how well modulated and how reasonably stated, are sadly succumbing to the temptation of rhetorical terrorism. Let us state clearly and unequivocally from both sections, from both aisles, that the challenge for us remains, first and foremost, to keep Social Security intact for today's seniors. But, at the same time, we should welcome a national dialogue on something this vitally important. I listened with great interest, Mr. Speaker, to my colleague from Arizona. Because I, too, have formed a citizen's committee on retirement. I, too, invited not only current retirees but baby boomers and members of the next generation to join in a dialogue. That is the key to dealing with this problem.
NAN A. S. HAYWORTH: “I would welcome the gentlewoman joining with the chairman of the Subcommittee on Social Security in sponsoring H.R. 3351…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for a national dialogue on Social Security and the protection of benefits for current seniors.
Share
More from NAN A. S. HAYWORTH
We know how important small bank lending is to small communities or to any community, to businesses and to helping businesses grow and create jobs.
We want our small businesses to be able to acquire capital, we want investors to be able to engage in that marketplace ever more fully.
just a few short weeks ago, the Prime Minister of Israel addressed a joint session of Congress. He said, in part, and I quote, ``There has not been 1 year, 1 week, or even 1 day of peace in our tortured land.'' He went on to say, Madam…
where do I begin? Acknowledging that one of the central tenets and challenges of the legislative process is incremental reform, we can all understand that. But also understanding that in terms of truth in labeling, are we in fact engaged…





