MICHAEL GRIMM: “That is not a real alternative. That is the Government just paying for something because we do not have the alternative…”

I completely understand the need for actuarially-sound programs. But I think where we are missing it is the balance between actuarially sound and functionally and practically sound.

We want to move away from risk identification of that binary line. We want to move into graduated risk analysis and true flood management of multi-frequency hazards, including future conditions.

I am very concerned about the risks that the Fed's rapid balance sheet possesses to the stability of the Fed.

Simply put, they completely miss the mark. It is actually the veteran that may have Post Traumatic Stress that is actually training the dog.