Madam Speaker, it is clear that this point of order has nothing to do with unfunded mandates. Technically, this point of order is about whether or not to consider this rule and, ultimately, the underlying bill. In reality, it is about preventing the bill from moving forward without any opportunity for debate and without any opportunity for an up-or-down vote on the legislation, itself. It is about slamming the door on the legislative process. I think that is wrong, and I hope my colleagues will vote ``yes'' so that we can consider this important legislation on its merits and not stop it on a procedural motion. Let's stop wasting time on parliamentary roadblocks and get to the debate on this legislation, itself. It is a very important piece of legislation that has critical funding pieces in there for transportation and for housing. Those who oppose the bill can vote against it on final passage, but we must consider this rule, and we must pass the bill today.
Editor's note · Context
Arcuri addresses the importance of allowing debate on a bill related to transportation and housing funding.
Share
More from Michael Arcuri
Clearly, spending is one of the most important issues that we are dealing with here in Congress. ... I think this bill really is indicative of what the Democrats are trying to do. We recognize the fact that it is necessary to begin to make…
I understand that one of the biggest issues facing American families today is the cost of living and our economic future. I'm disappointed that the health of our Nation's financial institutions has come into question as a result of…
We have asked the American people to do a lot over the past year in order to work together to rebuild our economy. Tonight, we await the President's words to see how the country will move forward to continue to put people back to work and…
I rise today in strong support of this rule and the underlying bill. However, I would like to voice my strong opposition to one of the amendments that will be offered later on today, and that is the amendment to strike the second jet…





