I would submit that I agree with him that the FISA bill is necessary for the security of America. No one questions that. No one on our side of the aisle questions that. The question that we do have is does the Senate bill actually take away some of the liberty that is so necessary to the American people. All we are asking for is an extension of 21 days. When you think about it in the grand scheme of things, 21 days to make a determination whether or not this bill continues to give the American people the liberty that they have had for over 200 years, that is not a lot to ask for. I would much rather have 21 days, keep the bill in effect but extend it for 21 days, knowing full well that the end product is something that not only ensures our security but guarantees our liberty.
Michael Arcuri: “I would submit that I agree with him that the FISA bill is necessary for the security of America. No one questions that.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the FISA bill and its implications for American liberty and security.
Share
More from Michael Arcuri
I guess I would have to respond in that since when does helping people who lost their job have anything to do with being a liberal or conservative? I think people, the American people, hear people in Congress cite statistics and studies as…
Too much is at stake for us to simply pass our responsibility by opting for a mere extension of the current law.
When the economic downturn started during the last Administration, the President proposed a tax cut. Many of us, myself included, felt that the money might have been better spent in terms of putting it into infrastructure development.
Clearly, spending is one of the most important issues that we are dealing with here in Congress. ... I think this bill really is indicative of what the Democrats are trying to do. We recognize the fact that it is necessary to begin to make…





