this bill has been described as a clash between the super rich and the super wealthy. That Is unquestionably true, but in the clash of these titans, the question is, who stands for the American public? The answer to that question is, without the Conyers amendment, no one. The American people stand naked before the potential excesses of these giants unless we have some protection from them offered by the Justice Department. There is an incredibly high standard in this bill, Mr. Chairman. There must be a dangerous probability of substantially impeding justice before the Justice Department comes in. Let us pass the Conyers amendment and protect the American people.
Maurice Hinchey: “this bill has been described as a clash between the super rich and the super wealthy. That Is unquestionably true, but…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the need for the Conyers amendment to protect the public from powerful interests.
Share
More from Maurice Hinchey
That is exactly right, and I very much appreciate you putting that form up there, Cracks in Wall Street. It's a very interesting presentation and a very accurate presentation of the set of circumstances that were put into play over that…
I believe that there is clearly a role for the Federal Government when it comes to federally-supported parks.
I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Chair, I think it's very important for us to understand and remember how the economy here grew and how it became much more positive and progressive during those 8 years of the Clinton…
On rollcall No. 410, had I been present, I would have voted ``yea.'' ____________________





