this substitute would separately authorize $100 million for the Governor of each State to support community-based prevention drug and violence prevention activities. I am offering it as a compromise in an effort to try to resolve this contentious issue. Members need to understand that the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act is a program in serious trouble. Continuing questions about the effectiveness and accountability of this program have led to dramatic reductions in funding. Last year the Appropriations Committee cut the program by one-third; this year the House Budget Committee has recommended cutting another $100 million from the program. To address these concerns, the committee has included significant new accountability requirements for school-based drug and violence prevention programs in the reauthorization. The education community has supported these changes. This substitute is an effort to establish a comparable measure of accountability for community programs funded under the Governor's share of drug-free schools appropriations. Under current law and under the Barrett amendment, the Governors receive a setaside off the top of total appropriations for the program. They do not have to demonstrate that their programs are effective; no matter what, they get their 20 percent. Some Governors have clearly taken advantage of this free ride.
Major Owens: “this substitute would separately authorize $100 million for the Governor of each State to support community-based…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing accountability measures for the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act during a House debate.
Share
More from Major Owens
I rise in support of the Congressional Black Caucus alternative budget. This is the most moderate budget we have ever submitted. However, we do take small steps in the right direction. We take steps in the direction of providing more funds…
You estimate, according to your statistics, maybe as many as two-fifths of the people on welfare could get off with just some enhancement of the job training and education program.
So we would go down from 5 million families to something like 3 million families.
So we have to have more support services for them when they get to regular school, and then eventually they are going to have a larger percentage of the juvenile delinquents, and later on the criminals. We are just going to throw away all…





