Is there any scientific evidence that supports their reasoning there in terms of the taking away out of the home, or they are saying they are going to cut them off in 2 years? It means a woman with a new baby, the baby is 2 years old, taking the mother away from a 2-year-old baby. Does that jibe with current scientific evidence about raising children? Or will it do more harm than good by throwing those children into an artificial situation? Even the best day care cannot make up for what a mother could do at home. Are they considering all of this?
Major Owens: “Is there any scientific evidence that supports their reasoning there in terms of the taking away out of the home, or…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the impact of policies on mothers and young children during a debate.
Share
More from Major Owens
So we have to have more support services for them when they get to regular school, and then eventually they are going to have a larger percentage of the juvenile delinquents, and later on the criminals. We are just going to throw away all…
It is more reasonable to take the 5-year-old and 6-year-old as the cutoff point where the child is older and able to go to Head Start or school, kindergarten or regular school, and they are just going to overlook all of the evidence that…
I would like to clarify a position. The gentleman is the sponsor of a bill, H.R. 4114, on which I am a cosponsor and all the members of the Congressional Black Caucus are cosponsors, and there are in all more than a hundred cosponsors, and…
Is H.R. 4114 neutral on the question of military intervention? Does it discuss it at all?





