I never thought that an occasion would occur when I would have to rise and ask my colleagues to refrain from gutting the First Amendment to the Constitution. One would expect that after 200 years the Bill of Rights would have garnered a little respect in Congress, but gutting the First Amendment is exactly what this bill would do today. This religious freedom amendment is dangerous in that it breaches the constitutionally guaranteed separation of church and State, thereby reducing religious liberty and equality. Moreover, it would allow official school prayer and government funding of religious institutions. The most tragic results of this amendment, though, is that it sows the seeds of strife and divisiveness that the Bill of Rights was designed to protect us from. This level of debate denigrates both the Bill of Rights and this institution, and it also threatens the notion of religious tolerance that has made our country unique.
Louise Slaughter: “I never thought that an occasion would occur when I would have to rise and ask my colleagues to refrain from gutting the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill that would amend the First Amendment during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Louise Slaughter
Our creative industries have not been immune to the ongoing economic crisis. In fact, they have been particularly hard hit as corporate donations decrease, consumer spending on arts and culture activities dwindle, organizations struggle to…
I have significant concerns that the Federal Reserve Board's interpretation of the CARD Act could result... in stay-at-home spouses being denied access to credit.
Getting the antibiotics off the market would preserve the efficacy of drugs for both humans and animals.
I think innovation was very much at the heart of the complaint we filed against Facebook, right, that was not a price complaint.





