CBO reports that proponents of limiting malpractice liability argue greater savings in health care, possible through reductions in practice of defensive medicine. However, the defensive medicine is motivated less by liability than by the physicians, by the money it generates for them. And on the basis of existing studies and its own research, the Congressional Budget Office says savings from reducing defensive medicine would be very small. Also, there is no evidence that restriction on tort liability reduced medical spending.
Louise Slaughter: “CBO reports that proponents of limiting malpractice liability argue greater savings in health care, possible through…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of malpractice liability on health care costs.
Share
More from Louise Slaughter
Yes, so I think for a long time there has been a general sense in the antitrust world that vertical mergers are rarely bad, and in fact, may be mostly good.
Thousands of lives are at stake daily, and these pilots must be compensated properly to ensure that we attract the people who can fly the planes adequately.
I urge this panel to lend its support to this bipartisan effort so we can expose information that will inform future steps taken by Congress to improve pilot training practices and ensure passenger safety and confidence.
The cost of these infections and these ineffective treatments to our already strained health care system is astronomical.





