I disagree with the analysis of the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Hall). Primarily his argument seemed to say that this program is too expensive. But this is about our national security, it's about our economic security, and what is so necessary right now in our vision for America's future is the investment in the next generation. What we need to be is producing graduates who have science, math and technology expertise so that we can be competitive with both China and India in the generations and decades to come. We need to begin to fund the pipeline. I think the argument of being too expensive is misplaced. Second, I would like to say this is a priority for our Nation, and I think we can all agree to strengthen our economy, and our national security has to be number one.
Kirsten Gillibrand: “I disagree with the analysis of the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Hall). Primarily his argument seemed to say that this…”
Editor's note · Context
Responding to arguments about funding for science and technology programs.
Share
More from Kirsten Gillibrand
Everyone deserves a home free of potential health risks, yet thousands of New York families are exposed to dangerous lead paint daily.
This exposure is especially harmful to children, who are at disproportionate risk for adverse effects. I'm proud to deliver this funding from the Housing Appropriations bill that I negotiated to help clear hazardous lead paint from homes…
Firefighters put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe. We owe it to them to ensure that they have the resources and personnel they need to respond to emergencies as quickly as possible.
I could care less what they do with their money. This is not a nanny state.





