During our full committee markup on the Interior bill, Congressman LaTourette offered an amendment to prevent the Great Lakes States from receiving any EPA funding if they have implemented ballast water rules that have stronger timelines or standards than the Federal or international requirements that are currently in effect. At the time, Mr. Chairman, I asked that we look more thoughtfully at the potential impact this amendment might have. Since that markup, I have heard concerns from numerous groups and the State of New York. In addition, it is my understanding that both EPA and the Coast Guard are working towards finalizing national standards. Would you be willing as we move toward conference with the Senate to work with the New York Members, Congressman LaTourette, and other Great Lakes Members to help us find a workable solution to this problem of invasive species and ballast water discharges?
On the recordJuly 25, 2011
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from José E. Serrano
Jul 7, 2016
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New Hampshire will be postponed. Amendment No. 33 Offered by Mr. Hudson The Acting CHAIR. It…
Jul 7, 2016
It is interesting that there is a new bipartisanship here. I notice that this bill takes effect from now until January 21. So that means we will wait for Mrs. Clinton to become President before any new regulation would take effect…
Jul 7, 2016
I claim the time in opposition. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New York is recognized for 5 minutes.
Jul 7, 2016
I claim time in opposition. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New York is recognized for 5 minutes. {time} 1600





