Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 18, 2011
I think before we go any further on this subject, we really have to understand what is happening here. The majority party would like to do away with the health care reform law, and the way to do that is exactly that way, to try to do away with the law. But they don't have the votes in both Houses to do that. So what they're trying to do is not fund provisions that have to go into place. So at this moment what Mrs. Emerson is trying to do is say that no funds can be used to impose this mandate. Now, this particular part is going to get played out in the courts. So let's be honest: the courts will have to decide why it's okay to mandate that you have car insurance but not this particular issue. And there are going to be a lot of other issues that are going to be done. But the issue here is that they would like to legislate on this bill the end of health care. And that's just not going to happen. Lastly, what this amendment does is speak to the larger issue, which is that in this country now we have a law that provides access to quality health care to all residents regardless of who they are, where they live, or their income. The only people who are upset about this bill, about this law, and have done a good job of telling the American people that this is the end of the world, are the insurance companies who now have to step up to the plate and follow the law. So we know what this is about. We know what you are trying to accomplish, but it's not going to work.
Said by
José E. Serrano
Democratic · New York

Editor's note · Context

Serrano addresses attempts to undermine health care reform and the implications for access to quality health care.

Share

More from José E. Serrano

Jul 23, 2019

I look forward to hearing how annual funding supports your agencies' STEM programs, how you work in coordination with your Federal partners to not duplicate STEM efforts.

congress.gov
Mar 3, 2020

This committee, both under Republican and Democratic leadership, has always been very friendly to NASA.

congress.gov
Oct 15, 2019

Since NASA has already programmed the lunar landing mission for 2028, why does it suddenly need to speed up the clock by 4 years?

congress.gov
Feb 4, 2020

Sixteen years in the State Assembly and 30 in Congress, probably enough.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation