Mr. Chairman, we can all agree, I think, that this amendment is necessary. We are talking about denying tens of thousands of families and seniors access to an efficient, cost-effective program that keeps families together and lowers the government's costs over the long term. Without this amendment, we will see a spike in homelessness, a spike in medical costs, and a spike in hungry kids. I understand the point of order. I understand that the rules demand an offset for any funding increase in the bill. I also appreciate the chairman's efforts to support Section 8 and public housing. But when funding levels are this restrictive across the board, as they are in this bill, it is impossible to offset such drastic underfunding without hurting other people in need. The rules and the drastic underfunding of this bill make it impossible to meet basic human needs. I hope that, as we go forward, we can find a way to provide these funds so that kids, working families, and seniors are not out on the street, as I guarantee you this bill at this funding level will do. The CHAIR. The Chair is prepared to rule on the point of order. The gentleman from Iowa makes a point of order that the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York violates section 3(d)(3) of House Resolution 5. Section 3(d)(3) establishes a point of order against an amendment proposing a net increase in budget authority in the pending bill.…
Share & report
More from Jerry Nadler
Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment. The CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from New York is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. Chairman, again, this bill would take funds away not from illegal immigrants only; it would take funds away from everybody in many States and many cities. It would take virtually all funds for police; virtually all funds for highways…
Mr. Chair, I yield myself the balance of my time to close. Mr. Chairman, as we get closer to the end of our fiscal year with no resolution in sight, we are wasting our time with these absurd bills. I know that Members of this Chamber have…
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded again to refrain from engaging in personalities toward the President and the Vice President.





