I agree with the gentleman. I think the gentleman from Maryland makes a very valid point. Mr. Speaker, for all these reasons, I oppose this bill. I would simply say: We agree there is a serious problem with abuse of eminent domain, and we agree there may very well be decent legislation that would do something about the problem. If you are going to do it, draft legislation that really deals with the problem, that is constitutional, that will protect the small person such as Mrs. Kelo but that won't bankrupt the community in a way that is probably unconstitutional anyway. This bill is not the solution. We could, on a bipartisan basis, work for an intelligent solution, but this is not it. Accordingly, I urge a ``no'' vote. Mr. Speaker, I urge the defeat of this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Jerry Nadler: “I agree with the gentleman. I think the gentleman from Maryland makes a very valid point. Mr. Speaker, for all these…”
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
If their operations are legitimate and above-board, why is there a need for anonymity, and why don't they need warrants to come onto private property?
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
I strongly oppose this legislation, which is not rooted in medical realities. Physicians do not abort babies after birth, period. Healthcare providers have always been legally required to provide appropriate care. Patients and providers…
Let's be very clear. Sexual offenses and domestic violence are serious crimes and are already grounds for deportability and inadmissibility, as they should be. Unfortunately, this bill is so poorly drafted that it would result in extremely…





