Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 1, 2010
Every dollar we spend in Afghanistan, every life we sacrifice there is a tragic waste that does not enhance the security of the United States. We were attacked on 9/11 by al Qaeda. Al Qaeda had bases in Afghanistan. It made sense to go in and destroy those bases, and we did. But those bases are no longer there. They are in Pakistan and Yemen and Somalia, and we are not invading those countries. Why do we undertake to invent the corrupt government and try to impose it on the country? Afghanistan is in the middle of a 35-year civil war. We have no business intervening in that civil war. We have no ability and no necessity to win it for one side or the other. This whole idea of counterinsurgency, that we are going to persuade the people left alive after our firepower is applied to love the government that we like, is absurd. At this point we must recognize that rebuilding Afghanistan is both beyond our ability and irrelevant to our purpose of preventing terrorist attacks on the United States. We should support this amendment. We should support our troops. We should bring them home now.
Said by
Jerry Nadler
Democratic · New York

Editor's note · Context

Nadler addresses the futility of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan and advocates for bringing troops home.

Share

More from Jerry Nadler

Jul 17, 2025

A non-binding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…

newsweek.com
Dec 10, 2024

It's a gross abuse and ought to be investigated, although with Trump coming in, he's not gonna investigate it.

alternet.org
Jun 29, 2025

If their operations are legitimate and above-board, why is there a need for anonymity, and why don't they need warrants to come onto private property?

commondreams.org
Dec 3, 2024

As our country faces the return of Donald Trump, and the renewed threats to our democracy and our way of life that he represents, I am very confident that Jamie would ably lead the Judiciary Committee as we confront this growing danger.

nytimes.com

Other voices in this conversation