I agree with the gentleman. The standard way in which someone can vindicate rights is to sue. If the local government wants to abuse the rights of a homeowner, let's say, by an improper taking, the proper way for us to help is to give them the right to sue and to get injunctive relief. Let them go into Federal court and get an injunction which says: Do not tear down the building. Do not take away title. You can't do it because this is too broad a use of taking. It is a violation of the Fifth Amendment. This bill won't actually help that person because it gives them no rights except the right after they have lost the property. It gives them the right to go to court and not get any relief for themselves, not get the property back, not get any monetary damages, not get an injunction. It gives them the right to go into court and seek to block financial aid to the community. So they can say, ``I took revenge on the community,'' but what is the point? It doesn't help them.
Share & report
More from Jerry Nadler
I must say I find the gentlewoman's references to the Harris or the Biden-Harris war on women ironic coming from the Representative of a political party, the Republican Party, whose abortion policies have caused countless women to die, to…
The Trump administration is the most lawless in American history. That is why so many of his policies are being blocked through nationwide injunctions. Republicans see this as evidence of some liberal plot among the judiciary, but the…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 237, nays 180, not voting 14, as follows: [Roll No. 413]…
Once again, I point out that what everyone thinks of the Biden administration's immigration policies, the only effect of this bill would be to take all Federal funds away from States like New York, California, North Dakota, Utah. Again…





