But what the gentleman is doing goes further. What the gentleman is saying is the cap of 3 times economic damages $250,000, and we are going to deny part that have to the victim. If you want to say we should not have any cap at all, then it makes sense to say to the victim he should not unjustly enrich himself to any extent. I urge defeat of the amendment.
Debating an amendment related to caps on damages for victims.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
A non-binding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
This bill will put an end to those intimidation tactics, restore transparency, and ensure the public knows exactly who is wielding federal power in our communities.
They rushed this cruel bill to markup in the dead of night without even understanding what they were voting on.
Other voices in this conversation
