But what the gentleman is doing goes further. What the gentleman is saying is the cap of 3 times economic damages $250,000, and we are going to deny part that have to the victim. If you want to say we should not have any cap at all, then it makes sense to say to the victim he should not unjustly enrich himself to any extent. I urge defeat of the amendment.
Debating an amendment related to caps on damages for victims.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
The President’s decision to bomb Iran was grossly unconstitutional, since only Congress has the power to declare war.
A few minutes ago, four Republicans saved this House from disgrace. We almost passed a resolution to remove a Member from committees for the sin of exercising free speech. Charlie Kirk was a prominent figure, beloved by many, disliked…
If their operations are legitimate and above-board, why is there a need for anonymity, and why don't they need warrants to come onto private property?
This Nation is awash in guns. It is the only Nation where we have, time after time after time, school shootings, where we aren't even surprised at mass shooting events in schools. We are the only Nation that has mass shooting events…
Other voices in this conversation
