Of course, everybody associated with the doctor, under existing law, has the duty of giving the best possible medical care under any circumstances. That may be to transport the baby to the hospital. It may be that the baby is too frail to transport. But along comes this bill that says: We don't care about the real situation that doctor faces with that infant. We know how to practice medicine in every situation--we, in Congress--so we are going to say it must be brought to the hospital even if that might kill the child. It is just stupid, and that is why this bill must be opposed, not because it changes the standard of law or has anything to do with born- alive infants, but because it mandates that a child be brought to the hospital when medical care might indicate that that child in that situation should not be brought to the hospital. It may kill children. That is why we must oppose this bill.
Share & report
More from Jerry Nadler
Family members, legal guardians, and others work closely with victims of crime as they work to resolve the trauma of their victimization and the offenses committed against them. Having a strong support system can help victims feel…
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Jordan), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
I reserve the balance of my time. The CHAIR. Members are reminded to refrain from engaging in personalities toward nominees for the Office of President.
This amendment would create exceptions for government purchase of data that a Federal agency can already lawfully access without a warrant. I am sure that my colleague from New York means well, but I worry that this amendment would create…





