Of course, everybody associated with the doctor, under existing law, has the duty of giving the best possible medical care under any circumstances. That may be to transport the baby to the hospital. It may be that the baby is too frail to transport. But along comes this bill that says: We don't care about the real situation that doctor faces with that infant. We know how to practice medicine in every situation--we, in Congress--so we are going to say it must be brought to the hospital even if that might kill the child. It is just stupid, and that is why this bill must be opposed, not because it changes the standard of law or has anything to do with born- alive infants, but because it mandates that a child be brought to the hospital when medical care might indicate that that child in that situation should not be brought to the hospital. It may kill children. That is why we must oppose this bill.
On the recordSeptember 18, 2015
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Jerry Nadler
Mar 11, 2025
The warrantless arrest of any legal permanent resident seemingly solely over their speech is a chilling, McCarthyesque action in response to the exercise of First Amendment rights to free speech.
Dec 3, 2024
As our country faces the return of Donald Trump, and the renewed threats to our democracy and our way of life that he represents, I am very confident that Jamie would ably lead the Judiciary Committee as we confront this growing danger.
Jan 16, 2025
Let's be very clear. Sexual offenses and domestic violence are serious crimes and are already grounds for deportability and inadmissibility, as they should be. Unfortunately, this bill is so poorly drafted that it would result in extremely…





