Mr. Speaker, we have heard repeatedly, including from the last speaker, that so-called partial-birth abortion is never a necessary procedure to save the life and health of the mother, but fact is the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and I am reading now from the committee report, minority views, ``the leading professional association of physicians who specialize in the health care of women, has concluded that the D & X'' procedure, which is one procedure described by partial-birth abortion, ``is a safe procedure and may be the safest option for some women. ACOG has explained that intact D & E, including D & X, is a minor, and often safer, variant of the `traditional' nonintact D & E. ACOG has also stated that D & X `may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman. Only the physician, in consultation with the patient and based on her circumstances, can make this decision.' '' That is why relying on this kind of medical evidence, ``the Supreme Court concluded in Stenberg that `significant medical authority supports the proposition that in some circumstances D & X would be the safest procedure.' Indeed, the Court concluded that `a statute that altogether forbids D & X creates a significant health risk.' '' So much for the so-called findings in this bill, the Supreme Court has already thrown them in the trash basket.
Jerry Nadler: “Mr. Speaker, we have heard repeatedly, including from the last speaker, that so-called partial-birth abortion is never a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the medical necessity of partial-birth abortion during a debate on related legislation.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
It is with a heavy heart that I rise today, alongside my colleagues in the New York delegation and many of our other cherished colleagues, to mourn the loss of a giant of the House and a trailblazer for women in public service, Chairwoman…
I oppose this dangerous, dishonest, and undemocratic resolution. It is dangerous because it would require shredding the social safety net and gutting vital investments in healthcare, infrastructure, and public safety. It is dishonest…
FISA section 702 can be a powerful tool against foreign threats, but without significant guardrails against abuse, it is also a massive threat to the privacy and civil liberties of all Americans. That is why I must oppose this legislation…
We are going around in circles, but let me just add one thing. We call this the Midnight Rules Relief Act, but it is a big midnight. It extends the entire year, the last year of any President's administration. A whole year, that is hardly…





