This amendment does not appear to make any substantive change to H.R. 620. Whether or not the amendment is adopted, it still would be the case under the bill that a businessowner who fails to make substantial progress in removing an access barrier would be subject to a lawsuit. The amendment, however, does not address the fundamental concerns with H.R. 620's notice and cure provisions that I expressed in general debate, including the fact that the bill does not require a business to comply with the ADA, only to make ``substantial progress'' toward compliance within the bill's 180-day cure period. While the amendment does not make the bill worse, it also does not make the bill better. Regrettably, therefore, I must oppose the amendment. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
On the recordFebruary 15, 2018
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from Jerry Nadler
May 15, 2024
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, I am ready to close if the gentleman from New York is.
Jun 12, 2024
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This will be a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 216, nays 207, not voting 8, as follows: [Roll No…
May 15, 2024
I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Biggs).
Jul 22, 2024
Family members, legal guardians, and others work closely with victims of crime as they work to resolve the trauma of their victimization and the offenses committed against them. Having a strong support system can help victims feel…





