Whatever anyone may think of the debt or how to reduce it or the proper level of Government expenditures as a percentage of GDP, those kinds of policies are to be enacted as legislation which can be modified, amended, or repealed by future majorities, not enshrined in the Constitution to bind future generations to the opinions of this generation. That is fundamentally undemocratic and tyrannical.
Jerry Nadler: “Whatever anyone may think of the debt or how to reduce it or the proper level of Government expenditures as a percentage…”
Editor's note · Context
Nadler argues against constitutional amendments for budget policies, emphasizing democratic processes.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
This bill will put an end to those intimidation tactics, restore transparency, and ensure the public knows exactly who is wielding federal power in our communities.
The President’s decision to bomb Iran was grossly unconstitutional, since only Congress has the power to declare war.
They rushed this cruel bill to markup in the dead of night without even understanding what they were voting on.





