I want to say that the practice of physicians being offered incentives, positive incentives that if they deny a treatment, they get more money, and negative incentives, if they grant the treatment, they get less money, and this form of health care that is proliferating throughout this country has led, as the gentleman said, to many denials of health care where it was needed, and it also constitutes an institutionalized conflict of interest. If someone came to any Member of this body and said, ``Vote this way and I will pay you $1,000,'' we would call that a bribe, it would be against the law. But, in effect, what you have with many of these HMO's now is a practice where the insurance company comes to the doctor and says, ``If in all your patients this next week you do not refer more than ``X'' number to specialists or to have a test, a CAT scan, we will give you more money, and if you do, we will take away money from you.''
Jerry Nadler: “I want to say that the practice of physicians being offered incentives, positive incentives that if they deny a…”
On the recordJuly 17, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of financial incentives on healthcare decisions by physicians.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
Dec 17, 2024
We are going around in circles, but let me just add one thing. We call this the Midnight Rules Relief Act, but it is a big midnight. It extends the entire year, the last year of any President's administration. A whole year, that is hardly…
Jul 18, 2025
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
Sep 2, 2025
But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.





