Thinking of it another way, that $250,000 cap is now worth just over $56,000, nearly a fifth as much. Even assuming that $250,000 is the appropriate figure today, fairness demands that this cap be indexed for inflation going forward so that we do not see a similar erosion of value. But this bill locks in an already low cap and lets it dwindle away until it is worth essentially zero. I offered an amendment to adjust the cap to reflect 40 years of inflation, and to index it going forward, but the Rules Committee did not make it in order. Instead, we are forced to vote on a bill that, over time, will consider pain and suffering to be worth nothing at all. This bill would not reduce the cost of malpractice insurance, it would not drive bad doctors out of practice, and it would certainly not protect patients. What it would do is give a free ride to a healthcare provider, or a healthcare entity, that seriously harms a patient or a consumer. I urge my colleagues to reject this unfair and unnecessary legislation.
On the recordJune 28, 2017
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Jerry Nadler
Dec 10, 2024
It's a gross abuse and ought to be investigated, although with Trump coming in, he's not gonna investigate it.
Dec 17, 2024
First of all, I ask unanimous consent to include in the Record a letter from more than 250 organizations representing workers, consumers, and the environment opposing H.R. 115. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of…
Sep 25, 2024
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 255, nays 161, not voting 16, as follows: [Roll No. 454]…
Sep 2, 2025
But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.





