Are we really going to take sides in this scientific debate by jailing and bankrupting people who don't agree, or actually agree with the majority of the scientific community?
Editor's note · Context
Nadler questions the implications of enforcing a controversial bill against scientific consensus.
Share & report
More from Jerry Nadler
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Texas (Mrs. Lee Carter), the newest Member of the Judiciary Committee, proudly carrying on her mother's legacy.
This bill will put an end to those intimidation tactics, restore transparency, and ensure the public knows exactly who is wielding federal power in our communities.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, this bill does exactly the opposite of what the gentleman from Arizona says. This bill does not give us the chance to look at a regulation and decide whether it makes…
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Jordan), the chairman of the committee, says we don't like what the American people did. Well, obviously we don't. We lost the election…





