I want to put this debate into a little perspective. When the United States became independent, when our Constitution was adopted, there were many skeptics who said that our new system of government would not last, a republican form of government, a democratic form of government. There had been many republics and democracies in the past and in antiquity, in Middle Ages, but they had not lasted. They all, every single one of them, degenerated into oligarchies or autocracies. Skeptics said this new democratic republic would not last, either. There have been two greatest tests of our democratic system. In the Civil War, because of slavery, Lincoln quite correctly characterized it as a test of whether a government of the people, by the people, and for the people could survive. Now we face a second great test, the increasing domination of our politics by big money. People are cynical, and rightly so. They believe that their participation, their voices, cannot count against the power of big money, and recent experience says they are right. We all know the power of the HMOs, the pharmaceutical companies. We watched this Congress pass a $50 billion giveaway to big tobacco companies. We gave away, not sold, not rented, gave away a $70 billion spectrum to the broadcasting companies. Why? Because of the power of big money.
Jerry Nadler: “I want to put this debate into a little perspective. When the United States became independent, when our Constitution…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the influence of big money in politics during a debate.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
I thank Mr. Garcia and Mr. Neguse for organizing this Special Order hour about President Trump's budget request for next year. The one saving grace of the President's budget is how clearly it demonstrates the failed policies and misplaced…
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 236, nays 173, not voting 22, as follows: [Roll No. 501] YEAS--236 Aderholt Aguilar Alford Allen Amodei…





