I thank the gentleman. Isn't it true, sir, that the language that you read from the amendment says ``nothing in this bill''? It means that if the amendment were passed, the ability of the Congress or the courts to enforce the law against the President would be exactly the same as if the bill didn't pass, so it wouldn't immunize the President from the current law. It would immunize him from whatever new thing the bill would do, but not from the current law and whatever ability the courts have to restrain the President from not enforcing civil rights laws right now.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
It seems like the only actual lost children are the 1,000 children that were separated from their parents by the Trump Administration that still have not been reunited to this day.
Again, this bill would take funds away not from illegal immigrants only; it would take funds away from everybody in many States and many cities. It would take virtually all funds for police; virtually all funds for highways, bridges, and…
We in Congress have an important job as a co-equal branch of the government.
I strongly oppose this legislation, which is not rooted in medical realities. Physicians do not abort babies after birth, period. Healthcare providers have always been legally required to provide appropriate care. Patients and providers…





