I would simply observe the gentleman's substitute does very little, as you heard from those figures, to undo the inequity of the committee formula. The gentleman's substitute should not be adopted. The amendment of the gentleman from Illinois, which bases the allocation formula strictly on needs and on population based on the 1990 census, should be adopted as continuing the tradition of the House to base these allocations fairly on population and on needs. And if some States have much less needs currently, so be it. If others have greater, they should get proportionately what they need.
Jerry Nadler: “I would simply observe the gentleman's substitute does very little, as you heard from those figures, to undo the…”
On the recordMay 12, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Debating the allocation formula for federal funding based on population and needs.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
Jan 9, 2025
Due to a personal matter, I was not in Washington D.C. today. Had I been present, I would have voted NAY on Roll Call No. 7.
Apr 8, 2025
The Trump administration is the most lawless in American history. That is why so many of his policies are being blocked through nationwide injunctions. Republicans see this as evidence of some liberal plot among the judiciary, but the…
Mar 27, 2025
It is with a heavy heart that I rise today, alongside my colleagues in the New York delegation and many of our other cherished colleagues, to mourn the loss of a giant of the House and a trailblazer for women in public service, Chairwoman…





