Today, we are considering a bill that would require both houses of Congress to vote to approve, and for the President to sign, a motion of approval for any major rule in progress from our executive branch. We are considering this bill just a week after a splinter group of the far-right Republicans voted down a rule and held our legislative calendar hostage all to prove a point about a debt ceiling that already has passed Congress and has been signed by the President. Even before this radical move, I had no doubt that the REINS Act would grind to a halt the most impactful actions by our regulatory state. Now, after seeing what just a handful of Members will do just to make a point, I am certain that we cannot let bad measures like this one move forward. The REINS Act would frustrate the purpose of government and put our constituents in harm's way. Even if the underlying policy behind the REINS Act was a good idea, which it emphatically is not, I would still argue against it because it is unconstitutional. By allowing the regulation to be blocked from being implemented if even one Chamber declines to pass an approval resolution, the REINS Act is essentially a legislative veto, which the Supreme Court has already held to be unconstitutional. The goal of this legislation, quite simply, is to stop the regulatory process in its tracks, regardless of its impact on public health and safety.…
Share & report
More from Jerry Nadler
I have two comments before I call on the next speaker. Number one, I wouldn't count on the next Trump administration--maybe, but I wouldn't count on it. Number two, during the Trump administration, anti-Asian crimes spiked, and as I…
Before I speak on the LEOSA Reform Act, let me express my deep disappointment in the behavior of the Judiciary Committee majority. The Judiciary Committee is now considering a resolution to hold in contempt the Attorney General of the…
I reserve the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair will, again, remind Members to refrain from engaging in personalities toward presumptive nominees for the Office of the President. Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, I yield 4…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This will be a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 216, nays 207, not voting 8, as follows: [Roll No…





