this bill says very clearly that a fetus is more important than the physical health of the mother. But this bill is not about abortion. We all have different views. Some people view abortion as murder. Some think it is perfectly permissible. Some think it permissible up to a certain stage, others to a later stage. The Supreme Court says the constitutionally guaranteed right to choose is until viability. But this bill is not about abortion, it is about electoral politics. If an abortion is permitted under our law at 20 weeks or at 23 weeks or at 24 weeks, what moral distinction, what moral distinction is there between whether the fetus is killed in the uterus and then extracted or partially extracted and then killed? The fetus is still dead, it is an abortion. An abortion involves killing a fetus. We have different views on abortion here, but the Supreme Court, the Constitution guarantees the right to abortion. There is no moral distinction. It is purely electoral politics, an electoral politics in which the majority wishes to put the health of the mother at risk. Mr. Speaker, I rise to strongly oppose this unprecedented and mean- spirited assault on the constitutional right to choose. What this bill says very clearly is that a fetus is more important than the physical health of the mother.
Jerry Nadler: “this bill says very clearly that a fetus is more important than the physical health of the mother. But this bill is not…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill perceived to prioritize fetal rights over the health of the mother.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.
I thank Congressman Lawler for those kind words. Mr. Speaker, I now ask that all Members and staff throughout the Capitol rise for a moment of silence in remembrance of Chairwoman Nita Lowey. May her memory be a blessing…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 236, nays 173, not voting 22, as follows: [Roll No. 501] YEAS--236 Aderholt Aguilar Alford Allen Amodei…
I oppose this dangerous, dishonest, and undemocratic resolution. It is dangerous because it would require shredding the social safety net and gutting vital investments in healthcare, infrastructure, and public safety. It is dishonest…





