On the recordMay 6, 2013
it is certainly a legitimate government purpose, whether you agree with it or not, to avoid taking something to the Supreme Court
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Nadler discusses the government's discretion to avoid potentially damaging Supreme Court cases.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
Dec 3, 2024
As our country faces the return of Donald Trump, and the renewed threats to our democracy and our way of life that he represents, I am very confident that Jamie would ably lead the Judiciary Committee as we confront this growing danger.
Sep 25, 2024
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 255, nays 161, not voting 16, as follows: [Roll No. 454]…
Sep 2, 2025
But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.
Dec 17, 2024
As we have both said, we are going around in circles, so I will say what everybody has been waiting to hear: I am prepared to close, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Other voices in this conversation
