we are not here discussing the substance or the merits of the PATRIOT Act or the manner in which it was adopted 4 years ago or the sufficiency of the oversight of the PATRIOT Act by the Committee on the Judiciary. We will have plenty of time to discuss that on the floor in coming weeks. We are discussing the abuse of power and flouting of the rules by the chairman of the committee at the minority hearing on June 10. What the chairman said today did not contest or dispute a single point or a single allegation or assertion in the resolution. He did not deny that he rigidly cut off witnesses, every witness, in mid-sentence, a practice unheard of normally in the Committee on the Judiciary. He did not deny that he made several false and disparaging comments about members of the minority in violation of the rules. He did not deny that he refused on numerous occasions throughout the hearing to recognize members of the minority party attempting to raise points of order. He did not deny that he violated the rules by adjourning unilaterally and peremptorily the committee hearing while members were seeking recognition and seeking points of order. He did not deny that his staff cut off our microphones and even the lights when we were attempting to continue the hearing that he had illegally attempted to cut off. He says that I said that he chaired the hearing with an attitude of total hostility.…
Jerry Nadler: “we are not here discussing the substance or the merits of the PATRIOT Act or the manner in which it was adopted 4 years…”
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
This bill will put an end to those intimidation tactics, restore transparency, and ensure the public knows exactly who is wielding federal power in our communities.
A non-binding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
FISA section 702 can be a powerful tool against foreign threats, but without significant guardrails against abuse, it is also a massive threat to the privacy and civil liberties of all Americans. That is why I must oppose this legislation…
I oppose this dangerous, dishonest, and undemocratic resolution. It is dangerous because it would require shredding the social safety net and gutting vital investments in healthcare, infrastructure, and public safety. It is dishonest…





