The whole point of this debate is that when the Internet Moratorium Act was passed 22 years ago, the commission was charged with recommending a fair and equitable and nonburdensome way of giving equal taxation for the Internet and non- Internet, insofar as State sales taxes are concerned. This amendment is essential so when we are extending the Internet, whether for 2 years or 5 years, or whether we are extending the moratorium, whether for 2 years or 5 years or permanently, we at least have some basis for saying we are going to look also at the entire question which is intimately associated with this question.
Jerry Nadler: “The whole point of this debate is that when the Internet Moratorium Act was passed 22 years ago, the commission was…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Internet Moratorium Act and its implications for taxation during a floor debate.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
But I think a certain amount of change is very helpful, especially when we face the challenge of Trump and his incipient fascism.
The President’s decision to bomb Iran was grossly unconstitutional, since only Congress has the power to declare war.
Watching the Biden thing really said something about the necessity for generational change in the party, and I think I want to respect that.
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…





