I saw the news this morning that 400 and some odd Members of the House yesterday voted for an inquiry into impeachment of the President, including all of those of us who voted for the Democratic amendment to the Hyde resolution. That is simply not true. Many people who voted for the Hyde resolution voted for it, many people who voted for the Democratic amendment voted for it because they wanted an inquiry, but they thought the Republican Hyde resolution was a formula for an open-ended, politicized fishing expedition, and at least this would make it fairer. So they voted for the Democratic amendment, and then, when it failed, they voted against the Hyde resolution. Some of us, however, thought and think there is no impeachable offense described in the Starr Report. Even if you assume the President did everything it alleges he did, there is no impeachable offense. He should be punished in some other way for things he did that are not good things to do, but there was no impeachable offense.
Jerry Nadler: “I saw the news this morning that 400 and some odd Members of the House yesterday voted for an inquiry into impeachment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impeachment inquiry of the President during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 255, nays 161, not voting 16, as follows: [Roll No. 454]…
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
First of all, I ask unanimous consent to include in the Record a letter from more than 250 organizations representing workers, consumers, and the environment opposing H.R. 115. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of…
If their operations are legitimate and above-board, why is there a need for anonymity, and why don't they need warrants to come onto private property?





