When Congresswoman Demings introduced her superior version of this legislation last Congress, it would require the law enforcement officer who is purchasing the gun to undergo a background check. This is a commonsense requirement, given that an officer would undergo a standard background check to purchase the weapon from any other sellers. My colleagues submitted amendments that would add this background check requirement back in. It is unfortunate that that strong and reasonable amendment was not made in order. This amendment, the Jacobs amendment, does the next best thing. It would further define the good-standing requirement and help ensure that retired weapons are only transferred to those who can be trusted with them. This amendment will help close the gap between what a NICS check would reveal and what an employing Federal law enforcement agency would find in making a determination that an officer is in good standing. Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
Share & report
More from Jerry Nadler
Let's be real. The reason these migrants are in New York is because they were bused there involuntarily by Governor Abbott of Texas. Mr. LaLota's bill would remove from New York all Federal funding for schools, all funding for…
How much time do I have remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New York has 8\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from California has 6\1/2\ minutes remaining.
This amendment would add to the annual report a study on the impact of hacking and trade secret theft by the PRC on the United States economy. If anything, this amendment highlights the magnitude of agreement between Republicans and…
I have two comments before I call on the next speaker. Number one, I wouldn't count on the next Trump administration--maybe, but I wouldn't count on it. Number two, during the Trump administration, anti-Asian crimes spiked, and as I…





